04-10-2025, 09:15 AM
(This post was last modified: 04-10-2025, 10:46 AM by Alayan.
Edit Reason: Make pictures more visible :)
)
Time to throw my old dogs in the ring.
![[Image: attachment.php?aid=20]](https://forum.supertuxkart.net/attachment.php?aid=20)
Linux, 64-bit
CPU: Intel i3-4170 (3,7 GHz Dual-Core)
GPU: Intel Integrated Graphics 4th Generation (256 MB Memory)
60 FPS cap (removing this results in less images), Render driver: Open GL
Frames: 2275
![[Image: attachment.php?aid=19]](https://forum.supertuxkart.net/attachment.php?aid=19)
Windows XP, 32-bit
CPU: Intel Pentium D915 (2,8 GHz Dual-Core)
GPU: ATI Radeon HD 3450 (256 MB Memory)
30 FPS cap, Render driver: directx9
Frames: 986
Difficult to play on this 2007 machine on a handful of tracks (most notably Black Forest).
Interesting to see how over time, the "trash-worthy" 10-year-old hardware crossed the boundaries of the "bloated Mario Kart clone for Linux". It feels like the game became so much more playable through basically just waiting for the hardware to catch up. Hopefully this will be good PR for STK.
Linux, 64-bit
CPU: Intel i3-4170 (3,7 GHz Dual-Core)
GPU: Intel Integrated Graphics 4th Generation (256 MB Memory)
60 FPS cap (removing this results in less images), Render driver: Open GL
Frames: 2275
Windows XP, 32-bit
CPU: Intel Pentium D915 (2,8 GHz Dual-Core)
GPU: ATI Radeon HD 3450 (256 MB Memory)
30 FPS cap, Render driver: directx9
Frames: 986
Difficult to play on this 2007 machine on a handful of tracks (most notably Black Forest).
Interesting to see how over time, the "trash-worthy" 10-year-old hardware crossed the boundaries of the "bloated Mario Kart clone for Linux". It feels like the game became so much more playable through basically just waiting for the hardware to catch up. Hopefully this will be good PR for STK.